Laws and Cases on State Nationals vs U.S. Citizens

The U.S. is the federal corporation in the District of Columbia, also known as USDC or the UNITED STATES. It was created by the congressional act of 1871. Also see 28 USC 3002 (15) “United States” means— (A) a Federal corporation; So a U.S. citizen is a citizen of this federal corporation, and not a union State or USA republic.

So now it’s easy to see that a U.S. citizen is a legal fiction / U.S. corporation and has no rights secured by the constitution. Only people have rights secured by the constitution, not legal fictions. You are a State Citizen in the state you were born in, which makes you a Citizen of all states, and one of the people, and a beneficiary of, the republic U.S.A. constitution of 1789/1791.

A State Citizen is a Citizen of the United States of America. This is not the same as a 14th amendment “Citizen of the United States”. And the 14th amendment fell two states short of being ratified. So it does not lawfully exist. A 14th amendment citizen is born in the Untied States, which is a federal territory and subject to congress. This is not the same as being born in one of the several states of the Union. The United States of America is the dejure republic government, not the United States which is the corporation. The preamble to the constitution establishes the United States of America, not the United States.

So we have Two Different and Distinct National Governments. This treachery has always been the goal of the enemy.

See case law…."The idea prevails with some, indeed it has expression in arguments at the bar, that we have in this country substantially two national governments; one to be maintained under the Constitution, with all its restrictions; the other to be maintained by Congress outside and independently of that instrument, by exercising such powers as other nations of the earth are accustomed to... I take leave to say that, if the principles thus announced should ever receive the sanction of a majority of this court, a radical and mischievous change in our system will result. We will, in that event, pass from the era of constitutional liberty guarded and protected by a written constitution into an era of legislative absolutism... It will be an evil day for American Liberty if the theory of a government outside the Supreme Law of the Land finds lodgment in our Constitutional Jurisprudence. No higher duty rests upon this court than to exert its full authority to prevent all violation of the principles of the Constitution."

--Honorable Supreme Court Justice John Harlan in the 1901 case of Downes v. Bidwell.

It’s all about your citizenship. It’s that simple.

See case law…"Taxpayers are not [de jure] State Citizens." Belmont v. Town of Gulfport, 122 So. 10.

U.S. v. Anthony 24 Fed. 829 (1873) "The term resident and citizen of the United States (this means 14th amendment citizen) is distinguished from a Citizen of one of the several states, in that the former is a special class of citizen created by Congress."

So you can see in the above case citations that there are two national governments.

You are all below.

1. A State Citizen which is born in one of the several states of the Union. (Not the United States). See article 3 and the 11th amendment of the constitution

2. A “Citizen of the United States of America”, as penned in article one and two of the constitution. Notice that when you signed up to vote, it asked if you were a Citizen of the United States. This is the only citizen that can vote.

3. A Non-citizen national. This wording also applies to those born in the unincorporated islands of the United States (of America).

You are not any of the below.

1. You are not a United States citizen, which is a legal fiction and a franchise citizen of the federal corporation United States (District of Columbia). This one does not have any constitutional rights. Notice when you filled out your voter registration, it did not ask if you were a United States citizen. Because a United States citizen cannot vote.

2. You are not a United States national. Which is also a legal fiction. This one also does not have any rights.

3. You are not a 14th amendment citizen. This is someone born in the United States Territory and congress has authority over. And does not have all rights guaranteed by the constitution. See how it is worded…”…born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States…”

Remember that the U.S. citizen is a legal fiction, (a U.S. Corporation) with no rights. A 14th Amendment citizen has little rights. A State Citizen has absolute freedom and liberty protected by our founding documents. You are not a legal fiction, nor a U.S. corporation/US citizen, nor are you a 14th amendment citizen. You are a State Citizen of the state you were born in, which makes you a Citizen of all of the States, and a non-citizen national and a Citizen of the United States as penned in article 1 and 2 of the constituion.

Now I do not completely blame the law officers for their actions. They have been brainwashed by the truly evil people in government, elected officials, the BAR association and bankers. So it’s a little unfair to them, because they have so badly been misled. But they still have an Oath of Office, so there is no excuse for their behavior. If you are in law enforcement and reading this, I hope you will look at your Oath of Office and then the constitutions you have sworn to uphold. Dig for the answers and educate yourself. I have a great respect for peace officers that actually protects the people and puts their lives on the line for others. But I have no such feeling for those who violate their Oath of Office. Or cause trouble for people, when there is not injured party as required by the Common Law. See… "For a crime to exist, there must be an injured party. There can be no sanction or penalty imposed upon one because of this exercise of Constitutional rights."- Sherar v. Cullen, 481 F. 945.

State citizenship case law...

U.S. v. Anthony 24 Fed. 829 (1873) "The term resident and citizen of the United States (this means a 14th amendment citizen) is distinguished from a Citizen of one of the several states, in that the former is a special class of citizen created by Congress."

We have in our political system a government of the United States and a government of each of the several States. Each one of these governments is distinct from the others, and each has citizens of it’s own...” United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1875)

...he was not a citizen of the United States, (again 14th amendment citizen) he was a citizen and voter of the State,...” “One may be a citizen of a State an yet not a citizen of the United States”. McDonel v. The State, 90 Ind. 320 (1883)

That there is a citizenship of the United States (again a 14th amendment citizen) and citizenship of a state,...” Tashiro v. Jordan, 201 Cal. 236 (1927)

"A citizen of the United States is a citizen (14th amendment citizen) of the federal government ..." Kitchens v. Steele, 112 F.Supp 383

"Taxpayers are not [de jure] State Citizens." Belmont v. Town of Gulfport, 122 So. 10.

State v. Manuel, 20 NC 122: "the term 'citizen' in the United States, (means United States citizen or legal fiction) is analogous to the term `subject' in common law; the change of phrase has resulted from the change in government."

Supreme Court: Jones v. Temmer, 89 F. Supp 1226:"The privileges and immunities clause of the 14th Amendment protects very few rights because it neither incorporates the Bill of Rights, nor protects all rights of individual citizens. Instead this provision protects only those rights peculiar to being a citizen of the federal government; it does not protect those rights which relate to state citizenship."

Supreme Court: US vs. Valentine 288 F. Supp. 957:"The only absolute and unqualified right of a United States citizen is to residence within the territorial boundaries of the United States." (This is the legal fiction citizen of the federal corporation)

The Amendment (14th) recognized that "an individual can be a Citizen of one of the several states without being a citizen of the United States," (U.S. v. Anthony, 24 Fed. Cas. 829, 830), or, "a citizen of the United States without being a Citizen of a state." (Slaughter-House Cases, supra; cf. U.S. v. Cruikshank, 92 US 542, 549 (1875)). (Again talking about a 14th amendment citizen)

A more recent case is Crosse v. Bd. of Supervisors, 221 A.2d 431 (1966) which says: "Both before and after the Fourteenth Amendment to the federal Constitution, it has not been necessary for a person to be a citizen of the United States in order to be a citizen of his state." Citing U.S. v. Cruikshank, supra.(confusing, but recognizes State citizenship)

The courts presume you to be a federal citizen, without even telling you that there are different classes of citizens. It is up to you dispute this. Use your passport and the actual birth certificate. See…"Unless the defendant can prove he is not a citizen of the United States, the IRS has the right to inquire and determine a tax liability." U.S. v. Slater, 545 Fed. Supp. 179,182 (1982). (This one is misusing the term citizen of the United States for the purpose of confusion. It is a little tongue in cheek to say, a citizen who is a United States citizen)

"There are, then, under our republican form of government, two classes of citizens, one of the United States and one of the state". (Again making a distinction between a 14th amendment citizen and a State Citizen)Gardina v. Board of Registrars of Jefferson County, 160 Ala. 155; 48 So. 788 (1909)

"The governments of the United States and of each state of the several states are distinct from one another. The rights of a citizen under one may be quite different from those which he has under the other". Colgate v. Harvey, 296 U.S. 404; 56 S.Ct. 252 (1935)

"...rights of national citizenship as distinct from the fundamental or natural rights inherent in state citizenship". Madden v. Kentucky, 309 U.S. 83: 84 L.Ed. 590 (1940)

"There is a difference between privileges and immunities belonging to the citizens of the United States (14th amendment citizen) as such, and those belonging to the citizens of each state as such". Ruhstrat v. People, 57 N.E. 41 (1900)

"Therefore, the U.S. citizens (citizen of the federal corporation) residing in one of the states of the union, are classified as property and franchises of the federal government as an "individual entity"", Wheeling Steel Corp. v. Fox, 298 U.S. 193, 80 L.Ed. 1143, 56 S.Ct. 773

"...the first eight amendments have uniformly been held not to be protected from state action by the privilege and immunities clause [of the 14th Amendment]."Hague v. CIO, 307 US 496, 520

"The right to trial by jury in civil cases, guaranteed by the 7th Amendment…and the right to bear arms guaranteed by the 2nd Amendment…have been distinctly held not to be privileges and immunities of citizens of the United States guaranteed by the 14th Amendment…and in effect the same decision was made in respect of the guarantee against prosecution, except by indictment of a grand jury, contained in the 5th Amendment…and in respect of the right to be confronted with witnesses, contained in the 6th Amendment…it was held that the indictment, made indispensable by the 5th Amendment, and trial by jury guaranteed by the 6th Amendment, were not privileges and immunities of citizens of the United States, as those words were used in the 14th Amendment. We conclude, therefore, that the exemption from compulsory self-incrimination is not a privilege or immunity of National citizenship guaranteed by this clause of the 14th Amendment."Twining v. New Jersey, 211 US 78, 98-99

State Citizenship Test

The following are some of the citizenship questions you will see on various government forms styled in a way to deceive you out of your rights secured by the original constitution of our republic. United States of America and the original State constitutions. They have stopped using the term State Citizens on all of the forms for the purpose of constructive fraud.

Remember that a State Citizen is a not a national of the United States. But is a national of the United States of America. See…8 USC § 1101(a) (21) The term “national” means a person owing permanent allegiance to a state. (This is a State Citizen)(22) The term “national of the United States” means (A) a citizen of the United States, or (B) a person who, though not a citizen of the United States, owes permanent allegiance to the United States.(23) The term “naturalization” means the conferring of nationality of a state upon a person after birth, by any means whatsoever.

Answers at the end.

Which answer should a State Citizen choose?

A. Social Security form SS 5 application. It is most important to be familiar with this form. This is the form that automatically removes you citizenship and rights. On this form are the following choices.

Which answer should a State Citizen choose?

1. U S Citizen

2. Legal alien allowed to work

3. Legal alien not allowed to work

4. Other


B. On employee Eligibility Verification Form I-9 form. Which answer should a State Citizen choose?

1. A citizen of the United States

2. A noncitizen national of the United States

3. A lawful permanent resident

4. An alien authorized to work


C. Questionnaire for National Security Positions. Form 86. Which answer should a State Citizen choose?

1. I am a U.S. citizen or national by birth, or U.S. territory/commonwealth.

2. I am a U.S. citizen or national by birth born to U.S. parent(s) in a foreign county.

3. I am a naturalized U.S. citizen.

4. I am not a U.S. Citizen.


Answers

A. There is no choice for State Citizen, so the correct answer is 4. Other. The form goes on to explain that you need paper work from the State as to why you need a social security number. Your birth certificate is the paper work. As usual, your birth certificate is proof of your citizenship and should always be included with any answer or application.

B. 1. Again no State Citizen choice, but a Citizen of the United States is a State Citizen. But many has also checked off non-citizen national (2) with no problem.

C. Again, the Questionnaire for National Security Positions. Form 86 is an attempt to confuse. They combine U.S Citizen of the corporation with a national of the USA republic. A State Citizen is a national by birth. So the answer is 1. I am a U.S. citizen or national by birth, or U.S. territory/commonwealth.


**Source: HTTPS://WWW.COPPERMOONSHINESTILLS.COM


--------------------


United States v. Johnson, 76 F. Supp. 538, 539 (D. Pa. 1947), Federal District Court Judge James Alger Fee ruled that:

"The privilege against self-incrimination is neither accorded to the passive resistant, nor to the person who is ignorant of his rights, nor to one indifferent thereto. It is a fighting clause. Its benefits can be retained only by sustained combat. It cannot be claimed by attorney or solicitor. It is valid only when insisted upon by a belligerent claimant in person." McAlister vs. Henkel, 201 U.S. 90, 26 S.Ct. 385, 50 L.Ed. 671; Commonwealth vs. Shaw, 4 Cush. 594, 50 Am.Dec. 813; Orum vs. State, 38 Ohio App. 171, 175 N.E. 876. The one who is persuaded by honeyed words or moral suasion to testify or produce documents rather than make a last ditch stand, simply loses the protection. . . . He must refuse to answer or produce, and test the matter in contempt proceedings, or by habeas corpus."

A strict observance of the written laws is doubtless one of the high duties of a good citizen, but it is not the highest. The laws of necessity, of self-preservation, of saving our country when in danger, are of a higher obligation … To lose our country by a scrupulous adherence to written law would be to lose the law itself, with life, liberty, property and all those who are enjoying them with us; thus absurdly sacrificing the ends to the means.” - Thomas Jefferson to John B. Colvin, September 20, 1810.

"The individual may stand upon his constitutional rights as a citizen. He is entitled to carry on his private business in his own way. His power to contract is unlimited. He owes no duty to the state or to his neighbors to divulge his business, or open his doors to an investigation, so far as it may tend to incriminate him. He owes no such duty to the state, since he receives nothing there from, beyond the protection of his life and property, ...he owes nothing to the public so long as he does not trespass upon their rights.” - HALE v. HENKEL, 201 U.S. 43 at. 74-75. (1906)

All codes, rules and regulations are applicable to the government authorities only, not human/Creators in accordance with God's laws. All codes, rules and regulations are unconstitutional and lacking in due process …” Rodriques v Ray Donavan (U.S. Department of Labor), 769 F. 2d 1344, 1348 (1985).

There, every man is independent of all laws, except those prescribed by nature. He is not bound by any institutions formed by his fellowmen without his consent.” Cruden v. Neale, 2 N.C. 338 (1796) 2 S.E.

People are supreme, not the State.“ Waring vs. the Mayor of Savannah, 60 Georgia at 93.

The people of the State do not yield their sovereignty to the agencies which serve them. The people, in delegating authority, do not give their public servants the right to decide what is good for the people to know and what is not good for them to know. The people insist on remaining informed so that they may retain control over the instruments they have created.” (Added Stats. 1953, c. 1588, p.3270, sec. 1.)

The people are the recognized source of all authority, state or municipal, and to this authority it must come at last, whether immediately or by circuitous route.” Barnes v. District of Columbia, 91 U.S. 540, 545 [23: 440, 441]. p 234.

The government is but an agency the State -- the State being the sovereign people.” State vs. Chase, 175 Minn, 259, 220 N.W. 951, 953.

"The rights of the individual are not derived from governmental agencies, either municipal, state, or federal, or even from the Constitution. They exist inherently in every man, by endowment of the Creator, and are merely reaffirmed in the Constitution, and restricted only to the extent that they have been voluntarily surrendered by the citizenship to the agencies of government. The people's rights are not derived from the government, but the government's authority comes from the people. The Constitution but states again these rights already existing, and when legislative encroachment by the nation, state, or municipality invade these original and permanent rights, it is the duty of the courts to so declare, and to afford the necessary relief.” City of Dallas, et al. vs. Mitchell, 245 S. W. 944, 945-46 (1922).

A constitution is designed as a supreme enactment, a fundamental act of legislation by the people of the State. A constitution is legislation direct from the people acting in their sovereign capacity, while a statute is legislation from their representatives, subject to limitations prescribed by the superior authority.” Ellingham v. Dye, 178 Ind. 336; NE 1; 231 U.S. 250; 58 L. Ed. 206; 34 S. Ct. 92; Sage vs. New York, 154 NY 61; 47 NE 1096.

It is not the function of our government to keep the citizen from falling into error, it is the function of the citizen to keep the Government from falling into error.” American Communications Association vs. Dauds, 339 U.S. 382, 442, (1950)

A Sovereign is exempt from suit, not because of any formal conception or obsolete theory, but on the logical and practical ground that there can be no legal Right as against the authority that makes the law on which the Right depends.” Kawananakoa v. Polyblank, 205 U.S. 349, 353, 27 s. Ct. 526, 527, 51 L. Ed. 834 (1907)

"Wavers of Constitutional Rights not only must be voluntary, but must be knowingly intelligent acts done with sufficient awareness of the relevant circumstances and likely consequences.” Supreme Court case Brady vs United States, 397 U.S. 742, 748 (1970)

Sovereignty itself is, of course, not subject to law, for it is the author and source of law; but in our system, while sovereign powers are delegated to the agencies of government, sovereignty itself remains with the people, by whom and for whom all government exists and acts. And the law is the definition and limitation of power.” Yick Wo V. Hopkins - Supreme Court 118 U.S. 356 (1886)


Source: Brandon Joe Williams (OneStupidFuck.com)

--Free Training Courses, Forms and more!--